Script:
Owner:
Subdir:
Blog ID: 64040601
Group ID: User ID:
 
Insider Learning N.. SCM SAP Extended Warehouse Management - Exclusive...
Narrow by Topic:
Post Reply
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
Sticky: SAP Extended Warehouse Management - Exclusive Q&A with Chris Moose from IBM
9 months ago  ::  Sep 22, 2011 - 1:22PM #1
AJ Whalen
Posts: 13

Evaluating a move to SAP Extended Warehouse Management (SAP EWM)? Ask your technical questions about implementing SAP EWM
in an exclusive, live Q&A with SCM expert Chris Moose


How does SAP EWM change current practices for labor management, wave picking, cross docking, and task and resource management? What are the pitfalls to avoid when planning a migration from your current SAP or third-party WM applications? 


To review the discussion in this Q&A, the full Q&A below, or read the edited transcript now available on Insider Learning Network. 


If you have additional SCM questions at any time, you're invited to post your SCM questions by creating a "New Thread" in the SCM Forum. 


If you have not yet registered for this October 4 Q&A, you can still register now and receive Chris's SCM 2011 presentation “How and Why One High-Volume Warehouse Moved from a Heterogeneous Environment to SAP EWM,” previously available only to conference attendees.


Note: To post a question and participate in this exclusive live Q&A you must be a member of Insider Learning Network - join today for free.


Sponsored by


 

Moderated by Forum Moderator on Oct 06, 2011 - 09:46AM
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 6:39AM #2
valentinapopescu
Posts: 1

Hello,


 


I've seen in your material that you used a pre-configured model of EWM. Is this model based on what SAP delivers for EWM or is similat to IDES?


Also I noticed you used buiding blocks. Are they delivered by SAP or are they custom created?


 


In case you use kit to order process, is it possible to mass generate HU for kits?


 


Thank you and best regards.


 


Valentina


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 12:31PM #3
AJ Whalen
Posts: 13

Welcome to today's SCM Forum on warehouse management and SAP EWM.


We invite you to post your questions for IBM’s Chris Moose on Chris has worked with many early adopters of the SAP EWM software, and can give his advice on pitfalls to avoid, along with how to plan and evaluate your warehouse management needs, what differentiates SAP EWM from past SAP warehouse management processes, and how to prepare for migrating from legacy WM tools to SAP EWM.


Thank you, Chris, for joining us today and taking questions over this next hour.  Since there is a question already in the forum, I will let you start with that one.

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 12:35PM #4
ChrisMoose
Posts: 31

Oct 4, 2011 -- 6:39AM, valentinapopescu wrote:

Hello,


 


I've seen in your material that you used a pre-configured model of EWM. Is this model based on what SAP delivers for EWM or is similat to IDES?


Also I noticed you used buiding blocks. Are they delivered by SAP or are they custom created?


 


In case you use kit to order process, is it possible to mass generate HU for kits?


 


Thank you and best regards.


 


Valentina


 


hey - thanks for asking...  the pre-configured EWM model is similar to IDES in that it is a jump-start on some basic configuration settings.


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 12:35PM #5
Claudiu Maxim
Posts: 2

Hello Chris,

I have the current situation in which a warehouse task is generated to  pick a certain HU in order for it to be transferred to the GI-ZONE. This  is due to a consumption in ERP. The issue is that I have a pallet in  which I have 200 of these HUs (all with the same batch number). The WT  suggests me a HU but it is rather difficult to send the picker to search  among the 200 HUs to find and confirm it in the RF environment. I would  like the system to let the picker choose his WO on which he is working  and allow him to scan a random HU and replace the one from the pick WT  (if of course is from the same batch). I know I can use Exception  handling but this might prove to be used a lot and so it is not an  exception anymore.

At the storage type level, from which I pick, I have put the Level of  Avail. Qty to value 1 - Storage Bin as the theory states but it doesn't  help. Have you got an idea of what should be done?

Thanks.

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 12:37PM #6
ChrisMoose
Posts: 31

And lastly yes, you can can mass create HU's in the kit to order process but I think it is important to map the kitting process with the HU's and how they might be consumed or used

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 12:40PM #7
edkrasn
Posts: 1

Hi Chris,


Question about serial numbers. Standard SAP ECC configuration support only 18 characters serial numbers. Looks like EWM support 30 characters serial numbers. How two systems will communicate if I need to use more than 18 character serials.  Can I maintain material master in SAP ECC and serial master in EWM systems?


Thank you,


 


Edward K

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 12:41PM #8
DougS
Posts: 2

Hi Chris,


Can you describe the 2 or 3 most common mistakes / pitfalls that you've seen when moving from an SAP WM solution to SAP EWM?  And how best to avoid these?


Thanks,


Doug


 

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 12:42PM #9
ChrisMoose
Posts: 31

Oct 4, 2011 -- 12:35PM, Claudiu Maxim wrote:

Hello Chris,

I have the current situation in which a warehouse task is generated to  pick a certain HU in order for it to be transferred to the GI-ZONE. This  is due to a consumption in ERP. The issue is that I have a pallet in  which I have 200 of these HUs (all with the same batch number). The WT  suggests me a HU but it is rather difficult to send the picker to search  among the 200 HUs to find and confirm it in the RF environment. I would  like the system to let the picker choose his WO on which he is working  and allow him to scan a random HU and replace the one from the pick WT  (if of course is from the same batch). I know I can use Exception  handling but this might prove to be used a lot and so it is not an  exception anymore.

At the storage type level, from which I pick, I have put the Level of  Avail. Qty to value 1 - Storage Bin as the theory states but it doesn't  help. Have you got an idea of what should be done?

Thanks.


I understand your deliminator.  SAP WM had similar problems as you outline but in EWM there are some additional criteria you can use during the task creation that allow it to be neutral on the HU (a HU neutral task).  I agree that having a ton of pick exceptions is not the way to go as that would hamper subsequent analysis on why picks might not be performed as your planned.  So I think the task-creation process is where you should probe and I think it is possible to have it be neutral in the scenario you describe.

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 04, 2011 - 12:46PM #10
ChrisMoose
Posts: 31

Oct 4, 2011 -- 12:41PM, DougS wrote:

Hi Chris,


Can you describe the 2 or 3 most common mistakes / pitfalls that you've seen when moving from an SAP WM solution to SAP EWM?  And how best to avoid these?


Thanks,


Doug


 


Hey - lots of people are wondering about the WM to EWM conversion.  The areas I'd be worried about include:


 


1) assuming that the WM settings map directly to EWM;  there are so many more choices in EWM that one you most past basic structures (storage type level) it really becomes a activity of re-mapping the warehouse


 


2) EWM is far far more sensitive to master data than WM;  the entire task creation process and all the elaborate splitting logic now available to you hinges on accurate data across the warehouse but around the material specifically


 


3) Lastly I'd recommend taking a minimalistic approach -- with all the capability of EWM is fairly easy to design something too complex for the end users.  While WM had some limitations in some way its simplicity was an attribute.  It is important not to go overboard with what EWM can provide, at least initially, because fairly quickly one can design a process that is too elaborate.


I understand that there will be a session at the SCM 2012 conference on this very topic so you might want to investigate that too...  Anything else I can add specifically?

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
Post Reply
Quick Reply
Cancel
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing

    Become a member of Insider Learning Network:

    - Receive alerts for upcoming Q&As

    - Post your questions and get answers from a trusted network of peers and industry experts

    - Download free Member-only Resources including sample articles, presentations, and book chapters