|
2 years ago ::
Sep 22, 2011 - 1:22PM
#1
|
|
|
Evaluating a move to SAP Extended Warehouse Management (SAP EWM)? Ask your technical questions about implementing SAP EWM in an exclusive, live Q&A with SCM expert Chris Moose How does SAP EWM change current practices for labor management, wave picking, cross docking, and task and resource management? What are the pitfalls to avoid when planning a migration from your current SAP or third-party WM applications? To review the discussion in this Q&A, the full Q&A below, or read the edited transcript now available on Insider Learning Network.
If you have additional SCM questions at any time, you're invited to post your SCM questions by creating a "New Thread" in the SCM Forum. If you have not yet registered for this October 4 Q&A, you can still register now and receive Chris's SCM 2011 presentation “How and Why One High-Volume Warehouse Moved from a Heterogeneous Environment to SAP EWM,” previously available only to conference attendees. Note: To post a question and participate in this exclusive live Q&A you must be a member of Insider Learning Network - join today for free. Sponsored by 
Moderated by
Forum Moderator
on Oct 06, 2011 - 09:46AM
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 6:39AM
#2
|
|
|
Hello, I've seen in your material that you used a pre-configured model of EWM. Is this model based on what SAP delivers for EWM or is similat to IDES? Also I noticed you used buiding blocks. Are they delivered by SAP or are they custom created? In case you use kit to order process, is it possible to mass generate HU for kits? Thank you and best regards. Valentina
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 12:31PM
#3
|
|
|
Welcome to today's SCM Forum on warehouse management and SAP EWM. We invite you to post your questions for IBM’s Chris Moose on Chris has worked with many early adopters of the SAP EWM software, and can give his advice on pitfalls to avoid, along with how to plan and evaluate your warehouse management needs, what differentiates SAP EWM from past SAP warehouse management processes, and how to prepare for migrating from legacy WM tools to SAP EWM. Thank you, Chris, for joining us today and taking questions over this next hour. Since there is a question already in the forum, I will let you start with that one.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 12:35PM
#4
|
|
|
Hello,
I've seen in your material that you used a pre-configured model of EWM. Is this model based on what SAP delivers for EWM or is similat to IDES?
Also I noticed you used buiding blocks. Are they delivered by SAP or are they custom created?
In case you use kit to order process, is it possible to mass generate HU for kits?
Thank you and best regards.
Valentina
hey - thanks for asking... the pre-configured EWM model is similar to IDES in that it is a jump-start on some basic configuration settings.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 12:35PM
#5
|
|
|
Hello Chris, I have the current situation in which a warehouse task is generated to pick a certain HU in order for it to be transferred to the GI-ZONE. This is due to a consumption in ERP. The issue is that I have a pallet in which I have 200 of these HUs (all with the same batch number). The WT suggests me a HU but it is rather difficult to send the picker to search among the 200 HUs to find and confirm it in the RF environment. I would like the system to let the picker choose his WO on which he is working and allow him to scan a random HU and replace the one from the pick WT (if of course is from the same batch). I know I can use Exception handling but this might prove to be used a lot and so it is not an exception anymore. At the storage type level, from which I pick, I have put the Level of Avail. Qty to value 1 - Storage Bin as the theory states but it doesn't help. Have you got an idea of what should be done? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 12:37PM
#6
|
|
|
And lastly yes, you can can mass create HU's in the kit to order process but I think it is important to map the kitting process with the HU's and how they might be consumed or used
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 12:40PM
#7
|
|
|
Hi Chris, Question about serial numbers. Standard SAP ECC configuration support only 18 characters serial numbers. Looks like EWM support 30 characters serial numbers. How two systems will communicate if I need to use more than 18 character serials. Can I maintain material master in SAP ECC and serial master in EWM systems? Thank you, Edward K
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 12:41PM
#8
|
|
|
Hi Chris, Can you describe the 2 or 3 most common mistakes / pitfalls that you've seen when moving from an SAP WM solution to SAP EWM? And how best to avoid these? Thanks, Doug
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 12:42PM
#9
|
|
|
Hello Chris, I have the current situation in which a warehouse task is generated to pick a certain HU in order for it to be transferred to the GI-ZONE. This is due to a consumption in ERP. The issue is that I have a pallet in which I have 200 of these HUs (all with the same batch number). The WT suggests me a HU but it is rather difficult to send the picker to search among the 200 HUs to find and confirm it in the RF environment. I would like the system to let the picker choose his WO on which he is working and allow him to scan a random HU and replace the one from the pick WT (if of course is from the same batch). I know I can use Exception handling but this might prove to be used a lot and so it is not an exception anymore. At the storage type level, from which I pick, I have put the Level of Avail. Qty to value 1 - Storage Bin as the theory states but it doesn't help. Have you got an idea of what should be done? Thanks.
I understand your deliminator. SAP WM had similar problems as you outline but in EWM there are some additional criteria you can use during the task creation that allow it to be neutral on the HU (a HU neutral task). I agree that having a ton of pick exceptions is not the way to go as that would hamper subsequent analysis on why picks might not be performed as your planned. So I think the task-creation process is where you should probe and I think it is possible to have it be neutral in the scenario you describe.
|
|
|
|
2 years ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 12:46PM
#10
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
Can you describe the 2 or 3 most common mistakes / pitfalls that you've seen when moving from an SAP WM solution to SAP EWM? And how best to avoid these?
Thanks,
Doug
Hey - lots of people are wondering about the WM to EWM conversion. The areas I'd be worried about include: 1) assuming that the WM settings map directly to EWM; there are so many more choices in EWM that one you most past basic structures (storage type level) it really becomes a activity of re-mapping the warehouse 2) EWM is far far more sensitive to master data than WM; the entire task creation process and all the elaborate splitting logic now available to you hinges on accurate data across the warehouse but around the material specifically 3) Lastly I'd recommend taking a minimalistic approach -- with all the capability of EWM is fairly easy to design something too complex for the end users. While WM had some limitations in some way its simplicity was an attribute. It is important not to go overboard with what EWM can provide, at least initially, because fairly quickly one can design a process that is too elaborate. I understand that there will be a session at the SCM 2012 conference on this very topic so you might want to investigate that too... Anything else I can add specifically?
|
|
|