|
8 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2011 - 9:53AM
#1
|
|
|
What’s changed in profit center accounting with SAP General Ledger? A Q&A with Financials expert Paul Ovigele The SAP General Ledger includes some distinct changes to profit center accounting transactions. What are the key differences from the classic G/L, and how can understanding these changes help avoid errors and speed up profit center reporting? Join Paul Ovigele in a live Q&A today, October 13, 12:30 -1:30 p.m. ET, here in the Financials forum. Post your question for Paul on the changes to profit center accounting that come with the new SAP General Ledger and enhancement packages – including balance sheet calculations and transfers to profit centers, assessments, reconciliations, and features. To post your question, first be sure that you're logged in to Insider Learning Network. Then select the “Post Reply” button below. Paul will be answering questions as posts in the thread here, today, from 12:30 to 1:30 pm EDT. Refresh your browser periodically for the latest responses. If you haven't yet registered, register now and download a quick preview of the 7 key changes to profit center accounting from Paul’s upcoming presentation at Reporting & Analytics 2011: “Accelerate financial closes and period-end reports with improved integration between Profit Center Accounting and SAP General Ledger.” If you are not yet an Insider Learning Network member, join today! This Financials Forum Q&A is moderated by Gary Byrne, Editor of Financials Expert, and is sponsored by 
Moderated by
Forum Moderator
on Oct 14, 2011 - 01:07PM
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 06, 2011 - 5:04AM
#2
|
|
|
Paul, Will you be able to include any information on reporting from FAGLFLEXT whihc has profit centre balances. I'm particularly interested in: 1. the key figures linked to the table, (there are many and I'm not sure what they all show) 2. how to report on individual periods (profit centre trend analysis) and expecially the opening period. 3. drill down reporting vs report painter/writer - your views on which is most appropriate for quick profit centre reports. I( I think there may be a limitation preventing drill down reporting having a page break for each profit centre. 4. Reporting Profit centre values with sets created from the Financial Statement Variant.
Regards, George Mansfield (george.mansfield@logica.com)
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 06, 2011 - 11:45AM
#3
|
|
|
Can you discuss the various ways and options to achieve full Profit Center reporting in the General Ledger when there are a high number of CO based allocations? Based on what I have read from SAP, the Profit Center reports should now be sourced from the General Ledger. One of the areas I am trying to understand is the impact of CO only allocations, especially when there are multiple allocations and the allocations are sourced on secondary cost elements, on Profit Center reporting in the General Ledger. For example, the posting overhead via a cost sheet on labor costs, from CATS using activity types, then running settlement of these costs to a cost center. My initial thought is this would require additional general ledger accounts in the G/L for posting cross-profit center allocations in CO and still retain the nature of the original secondary cost element account. Also, this would require setting up the CO/FI auto-recon to post an entry when allocations cross profit centers. Otherwise, using a single account would not allow for proper financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 06, 2011 - 2:46PM
#4
|
|
|
Paul, Will you be covering Intercompany sales, Transfer Pricing, and Profit elimination within the same Profit Centers? Thanks & Regards Vijay
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 13, 2011 - 12:25PM
#5
|
|
|
Welcome to today's forum
Thank you for joining us today! In this one-hour Forum, we invite you to ask your questions on what’s new in profit center accounting with the current release of SAP General Ledger.
I’d also like to thank Paul Ovigele for taking questions today! Many of you have already posted your question in the Forum, and Paul will be responding to these shortly with his own posts in the Forum thread.
To post your question, please be sure to first log in to Insider Learning Network. (If you are not yet a member, sign in here.) Then click the "Post Reply" button below to enter your questions. Please periodically refresh your browser to see the most recent posts.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 13, 2011 - 12:30PM
#6
|
|
|
Paul,
Will you be able to include any information on reporting from FAGLFLEXT whihc has profit centre balances. I'm particularly interested in: 1. the key figures linked to the table, (there are many and I'm not sure what they all show) 2. how to report on individual periods (profit centre trend analysis) and expecially the opening period. 3. drill down reporting vs report painter/writer - your views on which is most appropriate for quick profit centre reports. I( I think there may be a limitation preventing drill down reporting having a page break for each profit centre. 4. Reporting Profit centre values with sets created from the Financial Statement Variant.
Regards, George Mansfield (george.mansfield@logica.com)
Hi George,
(1) There are several key figures linked to the FAGLFLEXT table. You can go to transaction GR23 and enter library “0FL” and click on the “Basic Key Figures” or “Key Figures” button. (2) You can add the period field as a characteristic when creating a form for drilldown reporting (FGI4) or when creating a report painter report (GRR1) (3) You can report on FAGLFLEXT by using the standard drilldown report S_PL0_86000028, or creating your own custom drilldown (FGI1) or report painter reports (GRR1). If you used classic PCA report painter reports then you can convert them to New GL reports using transaction FAGL_RMIGR. The advantage of drilldown reporting is the slice and dice functionality, which is now needed since there are now various characteristics that exist in the New G/L (segment, profit center, functional area, business area, etc). (4) Profit Center sets (also known as account groups) can be copied from the financial statement version by using transaction KE5B. This also works with New GL PCA.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 13, 2011 - 12:35PM
#7
|
|
|
Paul,
Will you be covering Intercompany sales, Transfer Pricing, and Profit elimination within the same Profit Centers?
Thanks & Regards
Vijay
Hi Vijay, Do you have a specific question on this topic? Transfer Pricing functionality has not changed that much with New G/L . The accounts that you set up in transaction 0KEK for transfer pricing are automatically transferred to the New GL.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 13, 2011 - 12:38PM
#8
|
|
|
Paul, Are there any benefits creating the reports (or linking the report library) to table FAGLFLEXT versus FAGLFLEXR? Mayank
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 13, 2011 - 12:40PM
#9
|
|
|
Can you discuss the various ways and options to achieve full Profit Center reporting in the General Ledger when there are a high number of CO based allocations?
Based on what I have read from SAP, the Profit Center reports should now be sourced from the General Ledger. One of the areas I am trying to understand is the impact of CO only allocations, especially when there are multiple allocations and the allocations are sourced on secondary cost elements, on Profit Center reporting in the General Ledger. For example, the posting overhead via a cost sheet on labor costs, from CATS using activity types, then running settlement of these costs to a cost center.
My initial thought is this would require additional general ledger accounts in the G/L for posting cross-profit center allocations in CO and still retain the nature of the original secondary cost element account. Also, this would require setting up the CO/FI auto-recon to post an entry when allocations cross profit centers. Otherwise, using a single account would not allow for proper financial reporting.
Hi, You’re right, with transaction OK17 you normally enter just one CO-FI account. You can however, break this down into different accounts per CO transaction (by clicking on the “Rules” button and flagging the “CO Transactions checkbox”). This will not get you the same granularity as the secondary cost elements but it will give you a guide as to where the posting came from.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 13, 2011 - 12:40PM
#10
|
|
|
Paul, What tables if any are eliminated with the new GL? Thank you, Kerri
|
|
|